usr/share/texlive/texmf/doc/man/man1/otftotfm.1 But with that installed the otftotfm manpage is still not accessible, due to it's path: I have installed, but apparently that doesn't pull in all the -doc files, such as texlive-bin-lcdftypetools-doc. usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/map/glyphlist/ The glyphlist.txt and texglyphlist.txt are in this dir: usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/enc/dvips/base/texnansx.enc So those paths in the otftotfm binary are surely wrong. Otftotfm: /builddir/build/BUILD/texlive-2008/source/inst/lcdf-typetools/texglyphlist.txt: No such file or directory Otftotfm: /builddir/build/BUILD/texlive-2008/source/inst/lcdf-typetools/glyphlist.txt: No such file or directory This process created a number of files in ~/.texlive2007, so I thought I would just rebuild the fonts with the above procedure which would hopefully put the appropriate files into ~/.texlive2008 Otftotfm -a -e texnansx -fkern -fliga -fsmcp \įePIrm27C.otf LY1-IM_FELL_DW_Pica_PRO-Regular-fsmcpĪnd then created LY1IM_FELL_DW_Pica_PRO.fd: I created it thusly (per the otftotfm manpage, which appears missing in your texlive-2008 packages):įePIrm27C.otf LY1-IM_FELL_DW_Pica_PRO-RegularįePIit27C.otf LY1-IM_FELL_DW_Pica_PRO-It Previously I had converted an OTF font for use in my document. T not loadable: Metric (TFM) file not found. ! Font LY1/IM_FELL_DW_Pica_PRO/m/n/12=LY1-IM_FELL_DW_Pica_PRO-Regular at 12.0p When I run pdflatex on my document now, I am getting a new error: I am currently running your texlive-2008 July 2nd build. usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/ly1enc.dfu There is a related(?) file that *is* installed on the system: I did re-run `texhash` but it had no effect. ! Package fontenc Error: Encoding file `f' not found. I now have this error, which I don't know how to resolve: I fixed this by running `texhash` as root. ! LaTeX Error: File `memoir.cls' not found. In texlive-2008 when trying to rebuild I first got this error: I have a document that I was building fine with the standard F11 texlive. I (eventually) did the full `yum -y install texlive-scheme-full` install to get all packages. I have upgraded my x86_64 F11 to texlive-2008 using this staging repo: Jindrich doesn't seem to have much time putting in forward, and there doesn't seems to be many people in the community interested in TeX related packaging, at least nobody ready to take over the whole texlive packaging. In my point of view, the reverse is the real issue: Fedora is not much interested in TeX. That being said it is true that the main target is still the texlive distribution itself, but texlive people are distro friendly. Many innovation in texlive 2008 allow to play better with distros. > typesetting quality, it will require a major shift in the TeX community to keep > So, although TeX Live beats the crap out of any office suite as far as the There is a mailing list setup especially for communication between One of the main texlive developpers is also the debian > enthusiasts who don't care much about the rest of Linux/Unix experience. Fundamentally, I think, the problem is that TeX is driven by typesetting
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |